When
I first stood back in 2008, one of the two things I was campaigning
against was the Income Tax Department's wilful disregard for the
Income Tax law.
Well,
thanks in no small part, I'm sure, to a then-Deputy Gorst, the Income
Tax Department mended its ways and started obeying the law.
Since
then, that deputy has gone on to become Chief Minister and it would
appear that the Income Tax Department has thought that he would be
too busy to notice if they went back to the law-breaking ways. And
they're right.
The
really bad news is that other departments have see the Income Tax
Department getting away with it and have followed suit. One of these
departments is Social Security.
They
break the law by independently re-calculating income. They do it so
that the figure is higher so you pay more social security and receive
less benefits. However, if the figure that they get differs in any
way from the figure calculated by the Income Tax Department, then
they're guilty of trying to defraud the public.
Let
me tell you about Paul. He was a gardener and handyman who diligently
paid his social security throughout his entire working life which was
about 40 years. Then he got cancer and became too ill to continue
working. So he turned to the Social Department for the help he had
paid for only to receive a letter telling him that they had
re-calculated his income and he was £2 over the limit and he wasn't
going to receive a penny
I'd
like to ask the minister in charge and all the civil servants
involved
How
did it make you feel stealing from a dying man?
Did
you feel good?
Did
it make you feel powerful?
Did
you pat your selves on the back because you'd "saved" the
department so much money?
How
did it feel to turn the cornerstone of a civilised society into an
abomination?
Well,
I hate to disappoint you but it didn't make much of a difference to
Paul because he died a few months later. But that's another story for
another evening
So
I'd like to end by leaving you with two questions to think about:
- How many more people are currently living with hardship this very second because the social security department is denying them the support that they are legally entitled to and have paid for?
- How come I know about this and the 11 standing members wanting to be senator don't? Is it because they don't want to know because this is all about ordinary people and it's not to do with finance or construction?
No comments:
Post a Comment